Consumers intentionally deceived about the health benefits of vitamin and mineral supplements

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

woman with questions(NaturalHealth365) A flawed conclusion by a federally funded group has sent waves of misinformation throughout mainstream media, leaving unsuspecting consumers with the impression that vitamin supplements, as well as mineral supplements, are a waste of money.

But recommendations by the taxpayer-funded group United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) were based on questionable evidence, according to Blake Gossard, Kira Schmid, ND, Luke Huber, ND, MBA and Steven V. Joyal, MD. The physicians recently voiced their concerns in Life Extension Magazine – while citing a number of studies disputing the USPSTF’s conclusions.

How anti-vitamin groups try to deceive the public

In statements issued back on November 12, 2013, the USPSTF declared there wasn’t sufficient evidence to support daily regimens of mineral and vitamin supplementation as a means for warding off cancer and cardiovascular disease.  One should not be surprised if this same organization would support the use of pharmaceutical drugs – even if there were significant (negative) side effects from its usage.

The problem with their conclusion, according to the physicians writing in Life Extension, is that the task force stretched the definition of multi-vitamin to consider trials where as few as three nutrients were studied. Further, a majority of the studies cited were short-term investigations, despite cancer and cardiovascular disease tending to be associated with long-term issues like, aging.

USPSTF also included one study that is considered flawed by the medical community, according to the Life Extension report.  This is a classic example of ‘junk science’ – with no validity – designed to persuade people into avoiding nutritional supplements

Real scientific studies reveal the power of nutritional supplementation

Two trials included in the analysis that were of moderate duration – the Physicians’ Health Study II (11.2 years) and the SU.VI.MAX trial (7.5 years) – both showed evidence of reduced cancer risk in men taking multivitamins.

The Physicians’ Health Study II (PHS-II) showed multivitamin supplementation to be associated with an 8 percent reduction in overall prevalence of cancer incidence, with a 12 percent reduction in cancer death during the duration of the study. This study also found a 39 percent decline in fatal heart attack risk for those taking a multivitamin.

In the Supplementation in Vitamins and Mineral Antioxidants Study (SU.VI.MAX), also a part of the USPSTF analysis, results showed a 31 percent reduction in total incidence of cancer in men receiving a multivitamin supplement.

Taken together, the results of these two studies indicated that men receiving the supplements had their risk of cancer reduced over 10 years. However, details of such a pooled analysis were not presented by USPSTF.

A simple way to reduce your risk of cancer and heart attacks

The physician authors writing in Life Extension cite a number of studies supporting the use of vitamin and mineral supplements. For example, a 2012 study, by European researchers, of 23,943 subjects taking antioxidant vitamin supplements across a span of 11 years were shown to be 48 percent less likely to die from cancer. The subjects were also 42 percent less likely to die from any cause when compared with those not taking an antioxidant vitamin supplement.

The physicians added that additional benefits of vitamin and mineral supplementation were found in the analysis as well. While not statistically significant, these findings support continued use of vitamin and mineral supplements.

Naturally, a healthy organic diet – rich in plant-based foods – will always be the best way to improve immune function and prevent disease.  Unfortunately, thanks to modern food production procedures, our farming soil and food supply has been depleted of valuable nutrients for optimal health, which is why nutritional supplements may prove to be quite helpful for many people. In fact, even Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (formerly Harvard School of Public Health) has stated, “a multivitamin can help fill in the gaps, and may have added health benefits.”


Gain INSTANT Access:

  • » Vaccine World Summit
  • » 7-Day Juice Cleanse
  • » FREE Newsletter

Keep Reading:

  • Rich DeStefano

    Why would profit making pharmaceutical corporations want you not to depend on drugs for health. The underlying cause of degenerative disease is nutrient deficiencies. If you even look at Ebola you can see it is most dangerous to people who have low levels of both vitamins and minerals.

    Our food supply makes the need to supplement. The results of vitamin testing are inaccurate and by eliminating their popularity they can target a population with the notion that only drugs are the potential treatment.

  • Cynthia W

    Healthcare in this country have successfully employed an array of strategies to grow. They are not interested in creating visible ways for for the public not to depend on drugs. Healthcare doesn’t deliver health so looking at them an anything more than a partner with the pharmaceutical industry is wrong.

    The collaboration between them is how they capitalize and find opportunities to expand their grip on Americans.

  • Dale Roth

    Up to $50 billion is wasted because of inefficiencies that exist in the pharmaceutical industry and you expect to trust what they say. Regardless of which party comes up with the notion that supplements are useless and perhaps dangerous you have to remember they don’t understand the risks from their own drugs.

  • Glen Kingsley

    Supplements are meant to fill nutritional gaps, their purpose is to maintain overall health. Since conventional foods don’t deliver, it’s necessary to considered supplements as a way to get the missing nutrients.