Bad science exposed within breast cancer research

FacebookEmail
Print Friendly

Breast Cancer Fraud(NaturalHealth365) Is it bad science; marketing deception or outright medical malpractice within the cancer industry? There is growing evidence that pharmaceutical-sponsored, breast cancer studies are producing fraudulent data. Honest researchers reveal that patient outcomes and adverse side effects of phase three clinical trials are being twisted to favor the drug companies – even when the results suggest serious problems with using these drugs.

Breast cancer patients must be told the truth

Researchers at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto Canada found that a third of all trials failed to show statistically significant benefit for the treatment under investigation. Instead the reports focused on other, less important, outcomes in order to influence positively the interpretation of the results. Does this sound like the right thing to do?

In two thirds of the reports, there was bias in the way adverse effects of the treatments were reported; serious side effects were poorly reported and too many people remain in the dark about the dangers of these treatment protocols. In fact, the reporting of breast cancer trials – in medical journals are riddled with “spin and bias”, according to Canadian doctors who investigated the data.

Do conventional oncologist realize they are being deceived by big pharma?

Sad, but true, many conventional physicians are heavily influenced by fraudulent studies and base their treatment protocols on drug company literature. Professor Ian Tannock, a medical oncologist at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, identified all randomized controlled phase three clinical trials for breast cancer therapies published between January 1995 and August 2011. Guess what – out of a total of 568 articles – only 164 articles were more or less accurate.

Phase three clinical trials evaluate the efficiency and best dose for a given cancer treatment. This is the final stage, which a drug or therapy has to pass before treatment can be licensed for use in patients. Unfortunately, phase three trials primarily look at overall “survival rate” within a short period of time. Quality of life is rarely thought to be significant.

Would you bet your life on modern cancer research?

The simple truth is these bogus cancer studies trickle down to the doctor – who now give cancer patients an inaccurate report about the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatments. Putting aside ethical issues – when doctors downplay the dangers of drug therapies – patients get a false sense of security and lose the incentive to look for alternatives.

Can we really blame the doctors? Most physicians have no idea what’s going on and it’s up to us to get informed. Taking responsibility for our own healthcare is the only way to go.

For more information on (natural) cancer treatment protocols – become a monthly subscriber to the NaturalNews Inner Circle.

About the author: Jonathan Landsman is the managing director of NaturalHealth365.com and host of the NaturalNews Talk Hour – a free, weekly health show sponsored by NaturalHealth365.com and NaturalNews.com. Jonathan is helping millions of people worldwide create health and physical fitness through a variety of educational and entertaining articles, teleconference calls, live shows and special events.

Sources:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9790630/Breast-cancer-drug-trials-spun-for-impact.html
http://www.genomeweb.com/blog/breast-cancer-drug-studies-rife-spin-bias

SUBSCRIBE TODAY! Click here to join the NaturalNews Inner Circle – a monthly (online) subscription offering exclusive audio interviews, video events, natural health product discounts, free gifts plus much more!

Search here for more related articles about science news
Search here for more related articles about natural cancer treatments

STAY INFORMED! FREE Shows + Live Events

FacebookEmail

Gain INSTANT Access:


  • » Vaccine World Summit
  • » 7-Day Juice Cleanse
  • » FREE Newsletter
 

Keep Reading:

  • tony lane

    what many of us forget is that nearly all pharmaceutical research including GMO is intended murder or genocide,so lets just call it that there are no accidents and the governments are in on it,the people who are responsible for it are not eating the same or taking the same vaccine’s as the public,who are knowingly being forced to take these toxic poisons,i dont know if anyone remembers the time when TONY BLAIR was the prime minister,and he was asked the question if his children were taking any of the flu vaccine’s and he said no way,and went on to ignore the question why not,isthis not a classic example of do as i say and not what i do,people en masse have to take back the power to say NO and to be what we was all born to be,FREE.

  • tony lane

    as an addition to what i have already said, is it not possible to do away with these artificial medicine’s and vaccine’s eat the right food and herbs, what everyone really wants is to look better feel better and to live longer and we cannot do that if our governments have declared war on us,

  • Nutritional Oncology Research Institute

    Jonathan,

    The house of cards will fall soon. Mounting scientific evidence is telling us that cancer may be able to be treated with nutritional intervention alone.

    My passion and mission is focused on developing natural and nontoxic cancer treatment methods. I am currently evaluating a protocol based on selenium and vitamin K3. This is very simple and inexpensive but should be supervised by a physician trained on the protocol.

    The foundation or platform for any form of cancer therapy is a diet designed to starve cancer cells of essential nutrients. I have developed a methionine restricted diet that is very powerful and capable of treating early stage cancers without any other interventions.

    I hope to be able to share much more with the readers of NaturalHealth365
    in the near future.

    Thank you Jonathan for courageously communicating the truth about the evil and corruption within our medical establishment.

  • Pat

    i agree with tony lane