New government plan targets pregnant women for vaccinations

FacebookEmail
Print Friendly

wonan says no vaccine(NaturalHealth365) Federal health officials continue to push a widespread vaccination agenda, despite strong evidence that immunizations can harm or even kill patients while offering no reassurance of avoiding disease. But, now, this government-sponsored agenda has reached an all-time low.

Their latest target? One of the most vulnerable groups: pregnant women.

In a National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) report published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) earlier this year, the department details new concerted efforts to target pregnant women for vaccination. The report references the need for successful development of a national maternal immunization program, noting that the department had charged the NVAC with reviewing the current maternal immunization practices and identify barriers to better aligning those practices with broader immunization goals as described in the National Vaccine Plan.

A sick policy putting mothers and babies at risk

The primary areas of focus for the government’s new vaccination program targeting pregnant women are influenza and pertussis. Yet, you need look no further than the actual vaccine manufacturer’s product inserts to verify the vast deficiency in any evidence to counter fears over likely vaccine dangers.

This contraindication makes this policy absurd and its stupidity needs to be exposed. There simply hasn’t been adequate safety testing for the influenza vaccine when administered to pregnant women or to children under the age of five. Simply put, pumping toxic ingredients into pregnant women is morally, ethically and medically wrong!

Vaccine manufacturer’s admit that vaccines are inadequately tested

Sanofi Pasteur manufactures both Fluzone and Fluzone Intradermal. In the product literature for its Fluzone product, the company cautions:

“Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Fluzone. It is also not known whether Fluzone can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.”

In addition, vaccine producers also note there are ‘no studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine in children younger than six months of age.’ Every doctor should be against such a policy to force pregnant women to undergo such a risky medical treatment.

For its Fluzone Intradermal vaccine, manufacturer Sanofi Pasteur states:

“Safety and effectiveness of Fluzone Intradermal have not been established in pregnant women.”

The company’s product literature later describes research done in using the products with female rabbits, then correctly states:

“There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, Fluzone Intradermal should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.”

The vaccine’s literature also states that nursing mothers should not be administered Fluzone due to the high probability of toxins being transferred in mothers’ milk. The vaccine manufacturer further warns of vaccine dangers by cautioning: ‘Safety and effectiveness of Fluzone Intradermal in persons less than 18 years of age have not been established.’  Product literature from bioCSL regarding its AFLURIA influenze vaccine product tells a similar cautionary tale when it describes research conducted on rats, then states:

“There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.”

Cautionary statements regarding the products use in nursing mothers mirrors those made by Sanofi Pasteur. Regarding young children, the product’s literature clearly states it is not approved for use in children younger than five years of age. Need I say more?

Why are we ignoring these dangerous health warnings?

Despite the mountain of literature cautioning use of these vaccine products in pregnant women, nursing mothers and young children, the HHS is continuing to spend tax dollars on programs meant to administer vaccinations of unknown safety and effectiveness to otherwise healthy women and babies. The HHS reveals in the NVAC report it will be pressuring obstetricians to abandon their own educated medical opinion and instead, following recommendations of “professional organizations and government agencies” in pushing dangerous vaccines on their patients.

The HHS further states its plans to partner with “vaccination stakeholders,” which in nearly all cases is synonymous with those standing to make a buck from the sale of vaccines. It is shocking and shameful that a government agency shouldered with the responsibility to protect human health would conduct itself in a manner that would be considered illegal under any other circumstances. I suggest we sound the alarm and spread this information – far and wide – because exposing this truth has the potential to end this insanity.

References:
http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/nvac/reports/nvac_reducing_patient_barriers_maternal_immunizations.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM305080.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM263239.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM305089.pdf

FacebookEmail

Gain INSTANT Access:


  • » Vaccine World Summit
  • » 7-Day Juice Cleanse
  • » FREE Newsletter
 

Keep Reading:

  • Jerry Fishman

    They want the public to think the only way to not get the flu is by being vaccinated. The population is getting smart and refusing to get vaccinated.

    This is because people are questioning both the ability of the shot to protect and the possible side effects. The only way around this trend is to force vaccination on all.

  • Bob

    The installation in pregnant mothers is that they should avoid alcohol and drugs. One particular drug is called a vaccination but for some reason pregnant will allow this drug to be injected ultimately affecting their baby. Time and time again through history, the underline has occurred that pregnant mothers should never allow any drug into their system unless it is absolutely necessary for their own health. Self empowerment is key. Immune system of the mother is transferred to the baby by nature without interference.

  • SibyllasStuff

    I have read both the October 2014 Report of the Sage Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy and several PhRMA publications – in particular the one about 300 vaccines in development Holy Cow!!!
    pg. 2 Milestones in Vaccine Development
    1796 first vaccine ever developed is for smallpox
    1885 rabies vaccination
    1952 polio vaccine
    1981 hepatitis B vaccine
    2003 nasal flu vaccine
    2007 avian flu vaccine
    2010 first therapeutic cancer vaccine (U.S.)
    2013 egg-free vaccine

    In the last 10 years, this vaccine industry has certainly ramped up on the development of vaccines. They have garnered plenty of stakeholders over the past 60 years, but have they ever tested for all of the aluminum which is in the vaccines – to prove that it doesn’t accumulate in the body? NO. because if the truth was out, we’d all be a little annoyed.

    In this publication they are pushing all their vaccines – HPV for cervical cancer in particular is crazy given that cervical cancer in all stages is successfully treatable – so why would you pump a person full of things like aluminum and HPV virus. to prevent something that is treatable but the unintended consequences of this is unknown for sure.
    I have also read the 2010 Dept of Health and Human Services publication about the National Vaccine Plan boasting about how 6 new vaccines have been successfully introduced into the schedule for vaccines for kids. And the Draft Report of the National Adult Immunizaiton Plan. Feb 2015.
    When I was pregnant – the deal was no vaccines, no medications, no alcohol, no smoking healthy eating etc.

    Now they want to push vaccines on pregnant women.
    pg. 24 “The market is also limited for special populations that are smaller in size than the general population of adults, suggesting the need for targeted efforts to develop vaccines for use in pregnant women and in immunocompromised individuals.” Immunocompromised people – thank you no. I’d rather pump up my immune system rather than stress it out with vaccines and the junk in the vaccines.

    The use of the word “stakeholders” and the Healthy People 2020 initiative. Now we have Obamacare – we’ll all be given the needle – because with the computerized system we can be tracked and monitored. My eye doctor knew I had filled a prescription for an antibiotic and a mild steroid for bronchitis the day before. Oh don’t I feel special, not.

  • technicallysane

    This is not only insane…..I call it Satanic!!! I hope and pray that the public at large starts a massive push back against these merchants of death and injury.
    Sadly, there is a sizable portion of the population who are brain dead when it comes to doing any research on their own and finding out how lethal these vaccines can be.
    In my opinion, if certain people are adamant about the benefit of vaccines, then at least they should concede that some people are naturally at great risk. Since there is no test to establish the risk to certain individuals prior to toxic substances being injected into their body, vaccines should be banned. The key is…..no one knows, therefore it amounts to playing Russian Roulette with one’s own body.
    I wonder how many pro-vacciners have been injured or killed themselves from vaccines?

  • Ivet Flexon

    You should write about what they do to women in labor!

  • Lindaxox

    Before you may have thought they were evil – now you know for sure

  • Michael

    andatory vaccinations is mass extermination. Illuminati in control of FDA, CDC, and other gov. health organizations. Population elimination now in full swing with fluoride in the water, GMO and aspartame in food and poisons from chemtrails.