(NaturalHealth365)  A new sprayable COVID shot that enters your body through your nose has cleared its first human trial, but independent scientists are sounding urgent alarms about a terrifying risk the researchers completely ignored: the shot can spread from vaxxed to unvaxed people without their knowledge or consent.

The CVXGA1 intranasal shot, published in Science Advances, uses a live virus that replicates in your nasal passages and can be “shed” to others through normal breathing and talking.  Critics warn this could expose unvaxxed individuals — including pregnant women, children, and immunocompromised people — to genetically modified viral particles against their will.

But perhaps the most disturbing question is: why is this experimental shot even being developed?  Multiple studies have already documented massive harm from previous COVID shots, including heart damage, blood clots, sudden deaths, and immune system dysfunction.

With questionable efficacy and problematic safety profiles already established, why are researchers now pushing an intranasal version that could spread to others?

The shedding risk they didn’t want you to know about

The study’s own data proves the shot causes viral shedding.  Researchers detected the shot virus in nasal swabs of participants one day after administration, with levels reaching up to 3.9 log10 PFU/ml — meaning thousands of viral particles being shed from each person’s nose.

“The study didn’t examine if shed materials can be spread to others.  This raises significant safety concerns about replication and shedding risks,” warned investigative journalist Sonia Elijah.

Dr. Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense, explained the platform uses parainfluenza virus type 5, a “communicable respiratory virus between humans and non-human animals.”  Since this shot is “self-spreading,” he noted, “there is no informed consent or medical precautions as the ‘shot’ may infect infants, children, pregnant women, immunocompromised or medically frail.”

Dr. Karina Acevedo Whitehouse, professor of microbiology at the Autonomous University of Querétaro, agreed there are “high chances” this shot will result in “persistent shedding,” citing a 2023 study of a similar intranasal shot that detected virus shedding in 17% of participants.

Why create more dangerous shots when previous ones failed?

The rush to develop yet another COVID shot becomes even more questionable, considering documented failures of previous versions.  Government databases worldwide show unprecedented adverse events following COVID shots, including myocarditis in young people, sudden cardiac deaths in athletes, blood clotting disorders, immune suppression, and neurological damage.

Studies show shot efficacy wanes rapidly, often within months, while the spike protein these shots produce has been linked to cellular damage throughout the body.  With mounting evidence of harm and questionable benefit, developing an intranasal version that could potentially spread to non-consenting individuals raises serious ethical concerns.

The study’s fatal flaws

No control group: The study included zero unvaxxed participants for comparison.  “There is absolutely no way that this paper can be considered evidence that this intranasal gene-therapy based product is safe or effective,” Dr. Whitehouse stated.

Tiny sample size: Only 72 people participated — far too small to detect serious adverse events.

Limited safety monitoring: Researchers only tracked adverse events for weeks, not months or years.

No shedding studies: Despite detecting viral shedding, researchers performed no studies to determine if shed particles could infect others.

The spike protein is delivered directly to your lungs

The shot produces the same spike protein found in Pfizer and Moderna shots, linked to blood clots, heart damage, and immune dysfunction.  Unlike injected shots that stay in your arm muscle, this intranasal shot delivers spike protein directly to your respiratory system, potentially causing more severe reactions.

“Genetically modifying an infectious respiratory virus to express a spike protein is a familiar and really bad idea,” Dr. Jablonowski warned.

Natural immune system support that works

Instead of relying on experimental shots that spread without consent, focus on proven strategies:

Optimize vitamin D: Maintain blood levels between 50-80 ng/ml.  Deficiency dramatically increases infection risk.

Strengthen your gut: 70% of your immune system lives in your digestive tract.  Support it with fermented foods and probiotics while avoiding processed foods.

Power up with nutrients: Vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, and elderberry have strong scientific backing for immune support.

Reduce toxic load: Choose organic foods, filter water, and limit chemical exposure that suppresses immune function.

Manage stress: Chronic stress floods your body with cortisol, which suppresses your immunity.

The self-spreading agenda

Dr. Jessica Rose warns that if successful, “this could be used to push gene-based products on us via intranasal breathing routes.”  Shots that spread person-to-person without individual consent could eliminate medical freedom entirely.

With researchers planning to enroll 10,000 participants in the next phase, we’re moving toward involuntary exposure to this new gene-based therapy.

Your immune system has evolved over millions of years to protect you naturally when properly supported.  While pharmaceutical companies rush to develop self-spreading shots with unknown consequences, you have the power to strengthen your defenses safely and effectively.

For those serious about building a robust immune system without experimental interventions, Jonathan Landsman’s Immune Defense Summit offers comprehensive strategies from 34 leading doctors, scientists, and researchers who reveal natural protocols that help your immune system thrive.

Sources for this article include:

Science.org
Childrenshealthdefense.org