Pfizer’s deeply flawed COVID jab clinical trial contradicts company’s safe and effective narrative

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

pfizer-conducted-flawed-trial(NaturalHealth365)  Clinical trials are essential to bringing safe and effective drugs to market.  At the end of 2022, nearly 450,000 clinical studies were formally registered globally.  Yet, when we rewind to 2000, the number of clinical trials was a mere 2,119.  But, there is an even more alarming statistic that most people don’t know.

Recent reports indicate Big Pharma strong-armed its COVID shots through clinical trials, forcing an unsafe shot on the masses.  Let’s take a closer look at Pfizer’s deeply flawed clinical COVID jab trial that contradicts the company’s claim that the shot is safe.

FLAWED: 90% of original placebo group in Pfizer clinical trial received at least one mRNA injection

Though the verbiage used in scientific studies and clinical trials is quite complex, those willing to wade through the convoluted semantics are handsomely rewarded at the end of the language maze.  Watchdogs who’ve invested their time and effort analyzing Pfizer’s coronavirus mRNA jab clinical trial found some unsettling facts.  Exactly 90% of the trial’s original placebo group was provided with at least one mRNA injection by the spring of 2021.

The clinical trial of the drugmaker’s mRNA shot ultimately failed to show that the injection was effective and safe.  However, Pfizer claimed the opposite.

Pfizer halted the collection of useful data prior to the clinical trial’s planned ending.  The pharmaceutical company’s executives carried out inaccurate diagnostic tests that confirmed the virus in a small percentage of the patients involved in the analysis.  In other words, the clinical trial was in vain, purely used to advance the Big Pharma agenda and boost the company’s stock price.

Pfizer’s research team erred when relying on a flawed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for COVID diagnosis.  The test was highly inaccurate, providing false positive and negative readings.  However, the FDA gave the green light on using PCR for the clinical trial.  Pfizer unjustly determined the mRNA injections were effective in thwarting the virus simply because the supposed cases of COVID were actually in recipients within the placebo group.

SHOCKING PROBIOTICS UPDATE: Discover the True Value of Probiotics and How to Dramatically Improve Your Physical, Mental and Emotional Wellbeing with ONE Easy Lifestyle Habit.

Delve even deeper into Pfizer’s flawed shot trial, and you’ll find the company’s research team unblinded the trial’s control group, shooting them up with the mRNA jab.  These are just a couple of examples of the errors, omissions, and oversights that ultimately render the trial useless.  In summary, absolutely no legitimate conclusions can be derived about the efficacy or safety of Pfizer’s jabs as a result of its ineffective study.

Despite highly questionable clinical study, drug company insists mRNA shots are safe and effective

As is often said, every story has at least two sides.  Pfizer’s research team originally developed the trial using what the industry considered the optimal approach to drug analysis: a controlled, fully randomized, and double-blind trial.  In such a trial, the patients and researchers did not know who would be provided with the drug nor who would be provided with the placebo.

The research team selected participants at random to be given the placebo or the drug.  The researchers then compared the trial results to get a sense of which group had the best health outcome.

A controlled, Phase 3 randomized trial is the industry’s standard methodology for gauging the potential positive impact of medication or another treatment modality.  The purpose of randomizing a control trial is to gauge whether a cause-and-effect relationship exists in the context of the jab and health outcomes.

The FDA approved the company’s jab for emergency use in December 2020.  Making matters worse is the fact that the FDA and Pfizer were aware that clinical trial participants noted harsh side effects from the jab yet still permitted its widespread use.

It can be said without the slightest doubt that Pfizer and the FDA failed to fulfill their duty of due care.  In legal terms, such a failure to provide due care is referred to as negligence.  Both groups owe a duty of care to their customers and the taxpayers of the United States of America.  Pfizer and the FDA failed to uphold this duty, ultimately making them criminally negligent.

Sources for this article include:

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments