“Bad science” drives top experts to resign from CDC, NIH, and FDA

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

bad-science(NaturalHealth365)  Fresh off the announcement that Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and President Biden’s Chief Medical Advisor, plans to retire by the end of the President’s current term, we are now hearing from other major U.S. agencies about “high turnover,” “bad science” and other concerning revelations plaguing our country’s public health organizations.

From the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), senior officials are distancing themselves from the COVID shot propaganda and expressing grave concern about how public health policies related to the pandemic are being made (despite growing evidence showing just how harmful these COVID shots are).

JUMPING SHIP: Three letter agency execs resigning in droves

A July 14, 2022 article posted to Substack by Marty Makary M.D., M.P.H., and Tracy Beth Høeg M.D., Ph.D. outlines several concerns from anonymous senior officials, doctors, and scientists at the CDC, FDA, and NIH.  (These officials have chosen to remain anonymous for fear of professional repercussions).

Saying that many higher-ups at the nation’s leading public health agencies are “frustrated, exasperated and alarmed,” Høeg and Makary quote one FDA senior official who says, “It’s like a horror movie I’m being forced to watch, and I can’t close my eyes.  People are getting bad advice, and we can’t say anything.”

The senior official was referring to two recent and alarming developments from the FDA, including the authorization of COVID shots for infants and toddlers – despite “no solid clinical data” – as well as the FDA’s earlier decision to authorize booster shots for young kids despite bypassing the FDA’s external experts.

Høeg and Makary have also heard from officials at the NIH and CDC that turnover is high, morale is low, and there’s “no leadership right now.  Suddenly, there’s an enormous number of jobs opening up at the highest level positions,” one NIH scientist explained to them.

Experts and officials are leaving – why?  Because they are embarrassed, Høeg and Makary have learned.  They are concerned.

They are in shock over the “bad science” being relied upon to push school closures, mask mandates, and shots, particularly impacting the nation’s youngest and most innocent.  What will these public “health” policies’ long-term repercussions be?  Who will be held accountable for them?

While public health officials are warning of “bad science,” mainstream media is ignoring THIS significant harm of COVID shots

Despite what Big Brother News wants us to believe, there is no clear medical consensus over the safety and efficacy of COVID shot drugs (as the mass exodus of FDA and CDC officials suggests).  Consider a paper published last month in the Journal of Virology.

Called “Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them,” the paper starts by citing a recent study published by The Lancet, which investigated “the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time.”

“The [Lancet] study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals,” the Journal of Virology paper says, adding that the European Medicines Agency has warned that “frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.”

In other words, growing evidence suggests that multiple COVID shots damage immune function among jabbed recipients.

Additional points from the paper include the following:

  • Decreased immune function following COVID shots could be caused “by several factors,” including the spike proteins made by the body in response to the shot, the lipid nanoparticles found within the mRNA jabs themselves, and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)
  • These “clinical alterations” in immune function “may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles” (could it also be a plausible explanation for the unusual uptick in so-called monkeypox?)

Because of the detrimental effect on immune function that these COVID jabs have, the paper’s author concludes that “COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients” and that “as a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued” (emphasis ours).

Sources for this article include:

NPR.org
NIH.gov
Commonsense.news
Childrenshealthdefense.org

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments